Video
Tune in to ThinkHouse - another way to keep up to date with the legal issues and developments affecting in-house lawyers
Tune in to ThinkHouse - another way to keep up to date with the legal issues and developments affecting in-house lawyers
Wragge & Co pensions partner Richard Lee explains auto-enrolment and how the reforms should be implemented.
Vivien Cockerill: Hello, I'm Vivien Cockerill, head of pensions strategy. I'm going to be talking to Richard Lee, pensions partner, about the workplace pension reforms and in particular how those changes are going to be implemented. So Richard, we've looked at the reforms briefly and now we are talking about implementation. We talked about automatic enrolment of workers into a qualifying scheme, but what exactly is a qualifying scheme?
Richard Lee: Thanks Viv, a key provision of these reforms: qualifying schemes. It's pretty straightforward for the first two tests. It's an occupational or personal pension scheme, registered for tax purposes; so I think everybody would be familiar with those two pieces. You then move into the more difficult minimum requirements test. If you're using defined contribution or money purchase, the overall minimum requirements are for a 3% employer contribution and an 8% total contribution in steady state. Now that has been delayed and we wait to see what the government will say. Next, if you are using defined benefit schemes, there is a specific test for those. It's the contracted out test, or the test scheme standard specifically in this legislation. And finally for career average schemes, again there is a specific test in the legislation and a certain level of re-evaluation. So those are the provisions that apply for qualifying schemes.
Vivien Cockerill: So Richard, what is the difference between a qualifying scheme and an automatic enrolment scheme?
Richard Lee: OK, an auto enrolment scheme will always be a qualifying scheme, it has to be a qualifying scheme. But in addition, it has to allow automatic entry, it has to allow re-enrolment and it also has to allow members to opt-in at appropriate times. In addition it can have no barriers to entry, so in investment terms it will have to offer a default fund and it cannot require members to supply information before they join. So no barriers to entry.
Vivien Cockerill: And Richard in practice what does an employer need to do to bring people into an automatic enrolment scheme?
Richard Lee: Well, assuming that the employer has established its automatic enrolment scheme, when there is a new starter and once they have been assessed in terms of their eligibility, they will need to be given prescribed information - and we will come onto the detail - within certain timescales to allow them to understand the opt-out process, the auto enrolment process and what it would mean for them in joining the automatic enrolment scheme. After that process happens, the individual is then either enrolled into the scheme, and the employer will have noted that and registered that, or the individual will have opted out and again that record needs to be kept in terms of that individual's decision because there are re-enrolment processes that will affect the individuals who opt-out. So that in summary is the basic process.
Vivien Cockerill: Richard, how would an employer go about enrolling staff into a qualifying scheme?
Richard Lee: Yes, good question, so this will depend on whether the existing scheme meets the minimum criteria or not. If, assuming that it does not, you would need to make changes to that scheme to introduce the minimum criteria and the lack of barriers that we have discussed. If it's an occupational trust-based scheme, you will need to engage with the trustees to make sure that the amendments can be made if they need to be involved. In addition there may be consultation requirements with the workforce if you are making changes to the contribution levels in particular. If, on the other hand, you are using personal pension schemes through providers, you need to be discussing with those providers that their products are now compliant for auto-enrolment purposes and I expect that to be happening now.
Vivien Cockerill: So Richard, what information does the employer need to give the eligible jobholders and also those non eligible jobholders?
Richard Lee: Ok, well just as a quick reminder, eligible jobholders are those who earn over £7,475 and are between 22 and state pension age and can be auto enrolled into a qualifying arrangement and receive an employer contribution. They have to be given information about the pension scheme they are going to automatically enrolled into, whether they will or already have been auto enrolled, their rights to opt-out of that arrangement and general pensions and savings information to allow them to make an informed decision. So that's eligible jobholders. Non eligible jobholders are in that category between £5,035 and £7,475 who are not going to be auto-enrolled but they have a right to opt in to the scheme and receive an employer contribution. These individual have the right to receive information about their right to opt in and if they do opt in, they then should receive all of the information that an eligible jobholder receives.
Vivien Cockerill: Richard, can you tell me what are the timescales that employers are working to? How quickly do they need to deal with these new requirements?
Richard Lee: Well if we first talk about the initial staging date, so the information that we just talked about has to be supplied within one month of the initial staging date or within one month of the individual's automatic enrolment date. So it's quite quick; employers will need to be very organised about this. In addition, if employers choose to use the waiting period - which is the three month waiting period - they can delay their staging dates, although it is important to realise that employees can still opt in during that period. If they use the three month postponement period or waiting period, one month after that expires they have to supply this information. So essentially it's the one month rule that we are sticking to for the general supply of information. If, on the other hand, employers are simply telling individuals who are already in a qualifying arrangement, that they are in that arrangement and nothing else needs to happen, they have two months within which to do that after the initial staging date period. Just as another key and practical point, the information has to be supplied in writing. It's acceptable for it to be supplied by email and on intranet sites but it has to be individually targeted. So a general message on an intranet or on a workplace notice board is not sufficient for this purpose; they have to be individually targeted in writing.
Vivien Cockerill: And Richard finally, what about those employers who currently just have no pension arrangements? What do they have to do?
Richard Lee: OK, well key point for them is to go and find a provider who can give them an automatic enrolment scheme. The big one that everybody I'm sure knows about is NEST - the National Employment Savings Trust - but of course there are, every day, new suppliers coming onto the market, ATP the Danish providers, B&CE, the building/construction industry scheme which is also a new automatic enrolment scheme. So finding a scheme is the first step. If you fail to do that, you are breaching your duties and the Regulator has powers to fine you up to £10,000 a day in a worse case scenario for the larger employers. And in the worse case there are criminal sanctions as part of this legislation.
Vivien Cockerill: So those employers have no excuse?
Richard Lee: Absolutely no excuse at all.
This video may contain information of general interest about current legal issues, but does not give legal advice.
Kirsten Whitefield, a former in-house data protection officer and now a director in Wragge & Co's IT team, takes us through changes in the new data protection legislation.
September 2012
Michael Luckman talks to commercial litigation partner Andrew Litchfield about how you might survive a raid from a regulator.
September 2012
Michael Luckman talks to international disputes specialist Tom Price about jurisdiction clauses and how important they are.
September 2012
Nobody can prevent a contract breach, but there are ways to discourage it from happening - David Lowe and Andrew Smith discuss alternative strategies.
March 2012
David Lowe explains why getting the force majeure clause right and giving it sufficient detail is essential should the time come to exit from a contract.
March 2012
Commercial litigation partner Andrew Smith looks at how changing external factors can suddenly bring agreed contract terms into question.
March 2012
The last 12 months has brought an array of contract law cases. David Lowe discusses the key developments and their impact for you and your contract.
March 2012
David Lowe and Andrew Smith review one of last year's high-profile 'battle of the forms' cases and its implications.
March 2012
What constitutes 'indirect loss' and whether it can be excluded are frequently asked questions in contract negotiations. David Lowe gives an expert overview.
March 2012
David Lowe looks at why it's better to comprise and agree clear terms, than dig your heels in and end up with an incomplete contract.
March 2012
"It's either a breach or it's not a breach", or is that straightforward? Here we look at why the motivation for a breach is increasingly important.
March 2012
Ian Curry talks to Wragge & Co pensions partner Richard Lee about workplace pension reform administration
January 2012
Wragge & Co's head of pensions strategy, Vivien Cockerill, investigates the new duties placed on employers.
January 2012
Wragge & Co pensions partner Richard Lee explains auto-enrolment and how the reforms should be implemented.
January 2012
Beware of falling foul of data protection legislation - Kirsten Whitfield provides a helpful overview.
September 2011
Kirsty Barnes gives an expert overview of parent company guarantees.
September 2011
Clark Sargent digests key commercial litigation cases and their implications.
September 2011
Competition law can be a bit of a minefield. Nicola Lynch will be asking Bernardine Adkins how we can steer a safe path through that minefield.
April 2011
Time to go back to basics on contract formation? David Hamlett provides a helpful guide.
April 2011
Liability is fundamental in every contract. Sally Mewies is going to help us understand the recent trends in the law.
April 2011
We all hope nothing goes wrong with our contracts, but Nicola Lynch will be asking Clark Sargent how to manage it if we have to terminate our contracts.
April 2011
Could you be overlooking the value of boilerplate? David Lowe explains why it shouldn't be ignored.
April 2011
Wragge & Co's head of employment, Jane Fielding, talks TUPE.
September 2010
The Bribery Act is coming. Are you ready? Andew Litchfield looks at the new Act.
September 2010
New law is a big challenge for any in-house lawyer. Sally Mewies considers key trends.
September 2010
© 2013 Wragge & Co LLP. Wragge & Co LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, Registered No. OC304378.
Registered Office: 55 Colmore Row, Birmingham, B3 2AS; All rights reserved.